I think that the school board candidate John Campbell, should have told us in the beginning:
- that he is a fellow at the Discovery Institute,
- why someone who claims to be a Darwin scholar that does not advocate intelligent design would be affiliated with the Discovery Institute,
- and that he was involved in the Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District trial
The Discovery Institute Fellow
John Angus Campbell is a fellow for at the Center for Science Culture (CSC) of the Discovery Institute. As a fellow he has authored or co-authored 14 articles and co-edited a book, Darwinism, Design and Public Education.
John Campbell did not mention this during his campaign until it was reported in the Seattle Weekly. After the report, Mr. Campbell claimed that that he didn't mention that he is a Discovery Institute fellow because he had to condense an 18 page resume in higher education down to a one page snapshot
in a letter to the editor of the Belfair Herald. He found room to inform us that he did some minor surveying and major brush whacking for the Forest Service in 1960, I think that he could have told us about the Discovery Center if he wanted too.
The Discovery Institute/CSC is an often criticized organization that appears to have two related motivations: to promote intelligent design, and disprove evolution. According to the wikipedia entry.
The Discovery Institute is "best known for its advocacy of intelligent design and its Teach the Controversy campaign to teach creationist beliefs in United States public high school science courses.
Intelligent design is the assertion that "certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause. Intelligent design has been criticized by: the U.S. National Academy of Sciences, the National Science Teachers Association, the American Association for the Advancement of Science, and the consensus of the science community.
John Campbell claims that he is not an advocate of intelligent design, but a Darwin scholar. I do not understand why someone that opposes intelligent design and believes in evolution would be associated with the Discovery Institute. I believe that John Campbell is using words carefully, and that he believes in intelligent design without advocating it, and has studied Darwin's Theory of Evolution in order to find flaws in it. This is the essence of the "Teach the Controversy" campaign.
Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District
On December 20, 2005, in the Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District case, Judge Jones found that
Teaching intelligent design in public school biology classes violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States
The case was brought to the courts by parents of students in the Dover Area School District after the school board required making students aware of intelligent design in ninth-grade science classes when evolution was taught.
Before adopting the policy, members of the Dover Board of Education were given legal advice by the Discovery Institute. John Angus Campbell and several other Discovery Institute members agreed to be expert witnesses for the Dover School District. None of the institute's members testified at the trial.
In his letter to the editor, John Campbell claims, that he opposed the Dover policy and was fired because he strongly dissented. If Mr. Campbell so strongly opposed the policy why didn't he withdraw as an expert witness before he was fired on the day that he was supposed to testify? Stephen Meyer's affidavit regarding the termination of John Angus Campbell, William Dembski, and himself states that Mr. Campbell was fired because he insisted on private council.
As a result of this verdict, the Dover Area School District paid $1,000,011 in legal fees and damages due to the parents and their lawyers.
Should You Vote For John Campbell?
Before you vote for John Campbell, I think that you should ask some questions.
- Why didn't he disclose his connections to the Discovery Institute?
- If he is not an advocate of intelligent design, why is he a member of one of it's largest supporters?
- Do you want science class time spent studying theories that are not accepted by the scientific community?
- Are you willing to risk legal action if Mr. Campbell sucessfully pushes the Discovery Institute's agenda into our schools?
Related Links
- Discovery Institute Fellow runs for school board as “Darwinist”?
- Rural School Board Candidate Hasn't Been Forthcoming About His "Intelligent Design" Agenda Seattle Weekly
- Glenn Landram - Current School Board Member
No comments:
Post a Comment